🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to approve a bill increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a related step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful starting point," stated the parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and age appropriate for children," stated a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is mostly occurring at the state level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring adult authorization for minors to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Apart from these regions, additional states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this global debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that states around the world are increasingly content to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.